Actual product may not be exactly as shown.
|
$50.52 CAD
In Stock
(usually ships in 2-3 business days)
| Stock Check: |
Vancouver (
163
)
|
|
|
Deals & Related
|
Return & Warranty
|
|
|
|
Specifications
|
Reviews
|
Forum Messages
|
Q & A
|
|
-
Warranty Five years Cold Plate Material Copper Fan Specification 120mm (x1) Socket Support AMD AM2, AMD AM3, Intel LGA 1155, Intel LGA 1156, Intel LGA 1366, Intel LGA 2011, Intel LGA 775 Radiator Material Aluminum Tubing Low-permeability for near-zero evaporation Specifications | Radiator Dimensions | 120mm x 152mm x 27mm | | Fan Dimensions | 120mm x 25mm | | Fan Speed | Up to 1700 RPM | | Fan Airflow | 74.4 CFM | | Fan dBA | 30.2 dBA | | Fan Static Pressure | 3.2mm/H20 |
|
Summary (Write a review)
|
5 star: (0) 0%
4 star: (0) 0%
3 star: (5) 100%
2 star: (0) 0%
1 star: (0) 0%
|
| Rated by anon****@anonymous.com, April 16, 2012 10:40 PM
|
|
|
Strengths: right-click on "computer" or "my computer,"then select "properties"it will tell you the model of the cpu on that panel.Type the model number into google and you will get information on the cache size.References : car insurance cialis
|
|
Weaknesses: right-click on "computer" or "my computer,"then select "properties"it will tell you the model of the cpu on that panel.Type the model number into google and you will get information on the cache size.References : car insurance cialis
|
|
Summary: right-click on "computer" or "my computer,"then select "properties"it will tell you the model of the cpu on that panel.Type the model number into google and you will get information on the cache size.References : car insurance cialis
|
|
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No
|
| Rated by anon****@anonymous.com, April 9, 2012 1:44 AM
|
|
|
Strengths: It’s so easy to get this thing to 4ghz without changing the voltage at all. Just set FSB to 400mhz. It doesn’t start getting hot at all till you go over that. I have mine at 4.5ghz (450×10 1.41volts)) and it idles under 38C, and stress tests max 65C on air. (Zalman 9700 in an Antec 900 case).
Vista 64 is snappy and games play real smooth. Load times for everything are quick.
auto insurance cheapest auto insurance
|
|
Weaknesses: It’s so easy to get this thing to 4ghz without changing the voltage at all. Just set FSB to 400mhz. It doesn’t start getting hot at all till you go over that. I have mine at 4.5ghz (450×10 1.41volts)) and it idles under 38C, and stress tests max 65C on air. (Zalman 9700 in an Antec 900 case).
Vista 64 is snappy and games play real smooth. Load times for everything are quick.
auto insurance cheapest auto insurance
|
|
Summary: It’s so easy to get this thing to 4ghz without changing the voltage at all. Just set FSB to 400mhz. It doesn’t start getting hot at all till you go over that. I have mine at 4.5ghz (450×10 1.41volts)) and it idles under 38C, and stress tests max 65C on air. (Zalman 9700 in an Antec 900 case).
Vista 64 is snappy and games play real smooth. Load times for everything are quick.
auto insurance cheapest auto insurance
|
|
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No
|
| Rated by anon****@anonymous.com, April 5, 2012 11:18 PM
|
|
|
Strengths: it is something included in the processor, it is a fixed size set by the manufacturer and can not be altered by the user. Its purpose is to store and access constantly changing data through the processor rather than use the RAM simply because it is faster. Most modern processors have three levels of cache, L1 is always accessed first and is usually the smallest, then L2 and finally L3, in many processors this is a 3 or 4Mb space, with some running 6, 8 or 12Mb L3 cache levels. This figure is set to increase again with the next series of processors and will make data access quicker still.References : 20+ Years Experience РSenior Technician РElectronbox Mijas, Espa̱aIntel Technology Partner and a Member of the Microsoft Partner Network. car insurance auto insurance quotes
|
|
Weaknesses: it is something included in the processor, it is a fixed size set by the manufacturer and can not be altered by the user. Its purpose is to store and access constantly changing data through the processor rather than use the RAM simply because it is faster. Most modern processors have three levels of cache, L1 is always accessed first and is usually the smallest, then L2 and finally L3, in many processors this is a 3 or 4Mb space, with some running 6, 8 or 12Mb L3 cache levels. This figure is set to increase again with the next series of processors and will make data access quicker still.References : 20+ Years Experience РSenior Technician РElectronbox Mijas, Espa̱aIntel Technology Partner and a Member of the Microsoft Partner Network. car insurance auto insurance quotes
|
|
Summary: it is something included in the processor, it is a fixed size set by the manufacturer and can not be altered by the user. Its purpose is to store and access constantly changing data through the processor rather than use the RAM simply because it is faster. Most modern processors have three levels of cache, L1 is always accessed first and is usually the smallest, then L2 and finally L3, in many processors this is a 3 or 4Mb space, with some running 6, 8 or 12Mb L3 cache levels. This figure is set to increase again with the next series of processors and will make data access quicker still.References : 20+ Years Experience РSenior Technician РElectronbox Mijas, Espa̱aIntel Technology Partner and a Member of the Microsoft Partner Network. car insurance auto insurance quotes
|
|
1 out of 3 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No
|
| Rated by anon****@anonymous.com, March 27, 2012 10:35 AM
|
|
|
Strengths: hPjaHV wjyactjrkzai
|
|
Weaknesses: hPjaHV wjyactjrkzai
|
|
Summary: hPjaHV wjyactjrkzai
|
|
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No
|
| Rated by anon****@anonymous.com, March 26, 2012 1:46 PM
|
|
|
Strengths: What I know: The E2180 s only stepping is M0. It was eareesld much more recently the first E2100 s. The M0 stepping is NOT a step backwards rather it is a slight improvement in among other things V-Core or CPU voltage core. Other difference between the E2180 & the E2160/E2140 (either L2 or M0 stepping) is the Clock Multiplier: The value which is Multiplied by the the Front Side Bus (FSB). At stock speeds the E2180 is 10X multiplier (X) a 200 FSB = 2000Mhz or 2Ghz speed for each processor core. E2160 s have a lower multiplier 9x so 9Multplier x 200Mhz FSB = 1.8Ghz It is possible that an E2160 or an E2140 could be Overclocked further (stably) than an E2180. But this is not because of L2 or M0 stepping but rather a role of luck. Some processors are binned higher. There are poor E2140/E2160 L2 & M0 steppings just as there are great Overclocking E2160/E2140/E2180 chips. For the previous reviewer to make a statement that is wrong/false/misleading in so many ways does no one any good when trying to look at a processor. While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically. But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores. If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors). The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The more you raise the FSB the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal. These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000 s 2MB, and E6000 s 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance. Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians. When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000 s, the E4000 s, the E6000 s, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000 s; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy. Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000 s are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines. Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING. These processors (E2000) are not on the same level but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research. Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000 s 1MB to the E4000 s 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die). (Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000 s/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000 s & Q6000 .better yet the E8000 s & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000 s & E4000 s don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000 s & Q9000 s will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000 s &
|
|
Weaknesses: What I know: The E2180 s only stepping is M0. It was eareesld much more recently the first E2100 s. The M0 stepping is NOT a step backwards rather it is a slight improvement in among other things V-Core or CPU voltage core. Other difference between the E2180 & the E2160/E2140 (either L2 or M0 stepping) is the Clock Multiplier: The value which is Multiplied by the the Front Side Bus (FSB). At stock speeds the E2180 is 10X multiplier (X) a 200 FSB = 2000Mhz or 2Ghz speed for each processor core. E2160 s have a lower multiplier 9x so 9Multplier x 200Mhz FSB = 1.8Ghz It is possible that an E2160 or an E2140 could be Overclocked further (stably) than an E2180. But this is not because of L2 or M0 stepping but rather a role of luck. Some processors are binned higher. There are poor E2140/E2160 L2 & M0 steppings just as there are great Overclocking E2160/E2140/E2180 chips. For the previous reviewer to make a statement that is wrong/false/misleading in so many ways does no one any good when trying to look at a processor. While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically. But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores. If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors). The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The more you raise the FSB the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal. These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000 s 2MB, and E6000 s 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance. Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians. When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000 s, the E4000 s, the E6000 s, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000 s; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy. Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000 s are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines. Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING. These processors (E2000) are not on the same level but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research. Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000 s 1MB to the E4000 s 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die). (Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000 s/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000 s & Q6000 .better yet the E8000 s & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000 s & E4000 s don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000 s & Q9000 s will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000 s &
|
|
Summary: What I know: The E2180 s only stepping is M0. It was eareesld much more recently the first E2100 s. The M0 stepping is NOT a step backwards rather it is a slight improvement in among other things V-Core or CPU voltage core. Other difference between the E2180 & the E2160/E2140 (either L2 or M0 stepping) is the Clock Multiplier: The value which is Multiplied by the the Front Side Bus (FSB). At stock speeds the E2180 is 10X multiplier (X) a 200 FSB = 2000Mhz or 2Ghz speed for each processor core. E2160 s have a lower multiplier 9x so 9Multplier x 200Mhz FSB = 1.8Ghz It is possible that an E2160 or an E2140 could be Overclocked further (stably) than an E2180. But this is not because of L2 or M0 stepping but rather a role of luck. Some processors are binned higher. There are poor E2140/E2160 L2 & M0 steppings just as there are great Overclocking E2160/E2140/E2180 chips. For the previous reviewer to make a statement that is wrong/false/misleading in so many ways does no one any good when trying to look at a processor. While debates rage all day some swear by a lower multiplier some a higher one. But neither factors in that ALL CPU's are not made the same. Friends with the same motherboard & same CPU same memory case/power supply etc. One is able to Overclock this chip to 3.7 with voltage increases while the other friend reaches only 3.3 stably no matter how much voltage. That's life. No two systems will clock identically. But some additional facts to consider. If you are running this stock. The E2180 will be be slightly faster 2.0Ghz Vs E2160 1.8Ghz per cores. If you do OC. Suppose you decide you want to OC any E2000 to 3.0Ghz (A MODERATE OC on these excellent processors). The E2180 (10 x 300Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The E2160 (09 x 333Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The E2140 (08 x 375Mhz FSB)=~3.0Ghz The more you raise the FSB the more stress you put on your Northbridge. Some cheaper motherboards have hardwired FSB limitations. The higher multiplier E2180 & E2200 will be able to reach a higher speed sooner all other things being equal. These processors are capable of 75%-100% overclocking on AIR heat sink fans. For this processor that is 3.5Ghz 4.0Ghz. That is a huge bang for your dollar. Using Overclocking negates or can make up for some programs where this processors 1MB L2 Cache (compared to E4000 s 2MB, and E6000 s 4MB L2 cache) may slightly slow performance. Use google to search sites like anandtech, extreme overclockers etc for verified user/ and technicians. When you look at the four current lines of Intel Core 2 Duo desktop processors out: The E2000 s, the E4000 s, the E6000 s, & the newest Penryn (Wolfdale) E8400 soon to be more E8000 s; it can be difficult to decide which one to buy. Many people use the sole factor of cost of the processor to determine. The E2000 s are great processors for the majority of the public at Stock speeds (NOT EVERYONE LIKES TO OC OR NEEDS TO OVERCLOCK)!!! BUT IF YOU DO: For OC'ing enthusiasts these processors (can) offer amazing performance equal to or greater than their $200 $300+ more expensive E6000 & E8400 lines. Yes, obviously you can spend more on the E6000 & E8400 line & OC further for example the new Intel Penryn E8400 is able to OC from Stock 3.0Ghz to 4.0-4.5Ghz on after-market (AIR) heatsink fan combinations. It offers a number of other improvements (a smaller die size 45nm, new transitor gates, better power regulation/conserving, & SSE4.1 video instructions) make it a superior processor in all ways but PRICING. These processors (E2000) are not on the same level but these are also priced well below $100. If you are surfing the net, playing music/movies, writing papers etc no need to look any further. Even gaming although you'll need a good Video card & may need to OC the processor. Do your research. Even the $30-80 more for an E4000 is unlikely to benefit a majority of people for simply gaining 1MB of L2 cache. Going from the E2000 s 1MB to the E4000 s 2MB of L2 cache can be overcome by overclocking your E2000 if needed, but for & by average computer users the extra L2 cache offers very little. (Don't confuse L2 Cache with L2 Stepping they have NOTHING to do with each other; L2 cache is a small amount of memory included on the CPU's die). (Newer game/gamers, video editing/encoding etc. users would likely benefit from the extra cache but would likely be into the E6000 s/E8400 or Quad core processors. If you need VT (Virtualization Technology) for for running multiple OS's virtually, then look to the E6000 s & Q6000 .better yet the E8000 s & the upcomming Quad Penryn (Yorkfield) processors as the E2000 s & E4000 s don't offer (VT). The improvements in power saving & consumption of the E8000 s & Q9000 s will pay for themselves over the long time over the E6000 s &
|
|
1 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No
|
No messages found.
Please login to post a message.
|
The product has been added to cart!